Effect of Total Mixed Ration Feeding System on Dry Matter Intake, Nutrient Intake, and Onset of Estrus in Growing Dairy Cattle

Augusto Barros, G F Gundayo, C C Selvilla, J AN Bautista, J T Dizon, M M Loresco, R AB Narag, A A Angeles

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the advantages of total mixed ration (TMR) feeding versus component (COMP) feeding concerning dry matter intake (DMI) and nutrient intake in terms of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) intake, and the onset of estrus.  A total of ten growing Holstein Frisian (HF) x Jersey breeds were randomly assigned to participate in five months of feeding trials at the Dairy Training and Research Institute.  The design structure employed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) comprising five blocking factors under two treatment groups.  The TMR and COMP were composed of the same feed ingredients, including corn silage, Napier grass, concentrate mash, mixed legumes, molasses, and iodized salt, and they had the same quantity and nutrient requirements.  The TMR was prepared and mixed in advance, prior to the commencement of the feeding trial. In contrast, the components of the COMP were offered separately to the cattle following the specified feeding schedule.  The data were collected from the daily intake of the rations offered.  The feed refusal was weighed daily before the morning feeding periods, while the body weight gain (BWG) was recorded every two weeks.  While samples of the offered and refused feeds were collected once a week for nutritional analysis, the data were subjected to the ANOVA procedure of SAS Statistical Software.  The results demonstrated that DM, CP, NDF, and ADF intake was higher in the TMR than in the COMP group.  However, the differences in means for BWG, feed conversion ratio, and the onset of estrus were not significantly different.  In conclusion, TMR is expected to be beneficial in raising growing dairy cattle.

Keywords

Component Feed; Feeding System; Growing Dairy Cattle; Total Mixed Ration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen MS. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 83:1598–1624. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75030-2.

Bindari YR, Shrestha S, Shrestha N, Gaire TN. 2013. Effects of nutrition on reproduction: A review. Adv Appl Sci Res. 4:421–429.

Borland K, Kesler EM. 1979. Complete Rations for Holstein calves 8 to 18 weeks of age. J Dairy Sci. 62:304–309. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(79)83240-3.

Chander M. 2011. Chaff cutters and fodder chaffing: A simple technology worth adoption. In: Makkar H, editor. Proc FAO E-Conference Successes Fail with Anim Nutr Pract Technol Dev Ctries. p. 133–136.

Heinrichs J, Jones C, Suarez X. 2016. Feed efficiency in dairy heifers. Pennsylvania (USA): Pennsylvania State University.

Hundal JS, Gupta R, Wadhwa M, Bakshi M. 2004. Effect of feeding total mixed ration on the productive performance of dairy cattle. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 4:179–186.

Illius AW, Jessop NS. 1996. Metabolic constraints on voluntary intake in ruminants. J Anim Sci. 74:3052–3062. DOI:10.2527/1996.74123052x.

Karunanayaka RHWM, Liyanage RTP, Nayananjalie WAD, Kumari MAAP, Somasiri SC, Adikari AMJB, Weerasingha WVVR. 2021. Feeding Total Mixed Ration (TMR) on Production and Reproductive Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows: A Review. Agric Rev. 43:29–37. DOI:10.18805/ag.R-208.

Lee SJ, Kim DH, Guan LL, Ahn SK, Cho KW, Lee SS. 2015. Effect of Medicinal Plant By-products Supplementation to Total Mixed Ration on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Efficacy in the Late Fattening Period of Hanwoo Steers. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 28:1729–1735. DOI:10.5713/ajas.15.0290.

Li B, Sun X, Huo Q, Zhang G, Wu T, You P, He Y, Tian W, Li R, Li C, et al. 2021. Pelleting of a Total Mixed Ration Affects Growth Performance of Fattening Lambs. Front Vet Sci. 8:629016. DOI:10.3389/fvets.2021.629016.

Melendez P, Roy E. 2016. The association between total mixed ration particle size and fecal scores in Holstein lactating dairy cows from Florida, USA. Am J Anim Vet Sci. 11:33–40. DOI:10.3844/ajavsp.2016.33.40.

Mertens D. 1994. Regulation of Forage Intake. In: Fahey G, editor. Forage Qual Eval Util. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc; p. 450–493. DOI: 10.2134/1994.foragequality.c11.

Ngadiyono N, Baliarti E, Widi TSM, Maulana H, Atmoko BA. 2019. Effect of breed and initial body weight on daily weight gain of Simmental Ongole Crossbred Cattle and Ongole Grade Cattle. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 387:012044. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/387 /1/012044.

Nissanka N, Bandara R, Disnaka K. 2010. A comparative study on feeding of total mixed ration vs conventional feeding on weight gain in weaned Friesian Heifers under tropical environment. J Agric Sci – Sri Lanka. 5:42–51. DOI:10.4038/jas.v5i1.2331.

Saraye G. 2014. Effect of feeding method on the performance of growing dairy animals in Mauritius. Univ Mauritius Res J. 20:272–284.

Sarker N, Yeasmin D, Tabassum F, Habib M. 2020. Effect of paddy-straw based Total Mixed Ration (TMR) on milk yield, milk composition and rumen parameters in lactating Red Chittagong cows. Bangladesh J Livest Res. 21–25:69–81. DOI:10.3329/bjlr.v0i0.45449.

Schillo KK. 2011. Reproduction, events and management: Estrous Cycles: Puberty. In: Encycl Dairy Sci. Lexinton (USA): Elsevier; p. 421–427. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00448-9.

Schingoethe DJ. 2017. A 100-year review: Total mixed ration feeding of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 100:10143–10150. DOI:10.3168/jds.2017-12967.

Senger P. 2012. Pathways to pregnancy and parturition. 3rd ed. Redmond (USA): Current Conceptions. Inc.

Shike D. 2013. Beef cattle feed efficiency. In: Driftless Reg Beef Conf. Lowa (USA): Lowa Beef Center; p. 3–4.

Stevenson JS, Ahmadzadeh A. 2011. Replacement management in cattle: Breeding standards and pregnancy management. In: Encycl Dairy Sci. Elsevier; p. 410–416. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00446-5.

Waldo DR. 1986. Effect of forage quality on intake and forage-concentrate interactions. J Dairy Sci. 69:617–631. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80446-5.

Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA. 2006. Physically effective fiber: Method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89:2618–2633. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06) 72339-6.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



  • https://www.kiboshogirls.sc.tz/info/
  • jkr88
  • jkr88
  • https://legacy.stikesholistic.ac.id/file/
  • https://perpus.stiuda.ac.id/files/
  • https://infografis.bpsdmd.jatengprov.go.id/files/
  • https://msp.upr.ac.id/assets/data/
  • https://eprcug.org/word/
  • https://e-journal.stai-iu.ac.id/docs/
  • https://dkp.jatengprov.go.id/scatter/
  • https://kennebunkport.org/assets/
  • https://edu.ojs.co.id/thai/
  • https://laste.iatels.com/hitam/
  • https://kennebunkport.org/thailand/
  • https://sejurnal.com/
  • https://www.hinorajanyatruk.com/
  • https://joanlosangeles.org/
  • https://eprcug.org/
  • https://www.multiusos.net/data/
  • https://repository.stai-iu.ac.id/
  • https://sejurnal.com/
  • https://www.hinorajanyatruk.com/
  • https://pmb.stimbudibakti.ac.id/doc/
  • https://library.stimbudibakti.ac.id/source/
  • https://tracerstudy.sttpj.ac.id/data/
  • slot gacor/
  • slot gacor
  • https://renata.bpsdmd.jatengprov.go.id/public/data/
  • https://elibrary.staiduba.ac.id/
  • https://stikesphi.ac.id/file/
  • http://elearning.politeknikssr.ac.id/dosen/data/
  • https://sidamulya-sidareja.cilacapkab.go.id/
  • https://www.liga367.id/
  • https://liga367.shop/