Manipulation of rumen fermentation by bioindustrial products of cashew nut shell (Anacardiumoccidentale) to reduce methane and enhance other products

Andi Saenab, Wiryawan KG, Retnani Y, Elizabeth Wina
 DOI  https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v23i2.1821

Abstract

One of the strategies to reduce methane produced by ruminants is by the application of feed additive from plant materials. One of the potential plants is cashew plant especially its shell. The cashew nut shell can be processed to become 3 bioindustrial products; ie biofat, biochar, biosmoke. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectivity of different levels of biofat, biochar and biosmoke against methane and other fermented products.This experiment was arranged in block randomised design. The treatments were: Control (substrate=S), Biofat: S+0.25 µLmL-1, S+0.5 µLmL-1, S+0.75 µLmL-1; Biochar: S+0.1 mgmL-1, S+0.2 mgmL-1, S+0.3 mgmL-1; Biosmoke: S + 2.5 µLmL-1, S+5.0 µLmL-1, S + level7.5 µLmL-1. Each treatment was done in duplicates and the in vitro experiment was repeated 4 times. The measured variables were: total gas production, methane production, (dry matter, organic matter, NDF) degradability, ammonia concentration (NH3) and partial VFA concentration. The results showed that biofat, biochar and biosmoke reduced methane productionas much as  43.88%, 24.21%, 37.88%  at the highest level of inclusion, respectively. NH3 slightly increased by biochar and biosmoke addition compared to control. Molar proportion of acetic acid decreased and propionic acid increased by addition of cashew nut shell bioindustrial products compared to control. Organik matter degradability decreased significantly with biofat and biosmoke addition. Different mechanisms of biofat, biochar and biosmoke were proposed in affecting rumen fermentation. It can be concluded that each bioindustrial product of cashew nut shell (biofat, biochar and biosmoke) can be utilised as feed additive to reduce methane and increase propionic acid in the rumen fermentation.

Keywords

Anacardium occidentale; cashew nut shell; biofat; biochar; biosmoke; rumen fermentation; methane

Full Text:

PDF

References

[AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Arlington (USA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

Beauchemin, KA, Mcginn SM, Martinez TF, Mcallister TA. 2007. Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci 85:1990-1996.

Choi JM, Shinde I, Kwon K, Song YH, Chae BJ. 2009. Effect of wood vinegar on the performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microflora in weanling pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 267 – 274.

Cao BB, Wang R, Yang HJ, Jiang LS. 2015. In situ ruminal degradation of phenolic acid, cellulose and hemicellulose in crop brans and husks differing in ferulic and p-coumaric acid patterns. J. Agric. Sci. 153:1312–1320 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859615000489.

Do TTV, Nguyen TM, Ledin I. 2006. Effect of method of processing foliage of Acacia mangium and inclusion of bamboo charcoal in the diet on performance of growing goats. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 130:242-256.

Gerber PJ, Hristov AN, Henderson B, Makkar H, OH J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, Firkins J, Rotz A, Dell C, Adesogan AT, Yang WZ, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E, G. Waghorn G, Dijkstra J, Oosting S. 2013. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review. J. Anim. Biosci. 7:220-234.

Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (apparatus, reagents, prosedures and some applications). USDA Agricultural Handbook. 379.

Hansen HH, Storm MLD, Sell AM, 2012. Effect of biochar on in vitro rumen methane production. Acta Agric Scand, Section A-Animal Sci. vol 62-issue 4: Agriculture and greenhouse gasses: NFJ seminar no 453.

Hess HD, Kreuzer M, DiÌaz TE, Lascano CE, Carulla JE, Soliva CR, Machmüller A. 2003. Saponin rich tropical fruits affect fermentation and methanogenesis infaunated and defaunated rumen fluid. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 109:79-94.

Jayanegara A, Sofyan A, Makkar HPS, Becker K. 2009. Kinetika produksi gas, kecernaan bahan organik dan produksi gas metana in vitro pada hay dan jerami yang disuplementasi hijauan mengandung tanin. Med Pet. 32:120-129.

Jayanegara A, Wina E, Soliva CR, Marquardt S, Kreuzer M, Leiber F. 2010. Dependence of forage quality and metanogenic potential of tropical plants on their phenolic fractions as determined by principal component analysis. J. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.163:231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/Janifeedsci.2010.11.009

Jayanegara A, Marquardt S, Wina E, Kreuzer M, Leiber F. 2013. In vitro indication for favourable non-additive effect on ruminal methane mitigation between higtphenolic and high-quality forages. Brit. J. Nutr. 109: 615-622.

Kamra DN, Pawar M, Singh B. 2012. Effect of plant secondary metabolites on rumen methanogens and methane emissions by ruminants. In: AK Patra (Ed). Dietary Phytochemicals and Microbes. Dordrecht (GB): Spinger. p:351–370.

Knowles OAO, Robinson BHB, Contangelo AA, Clucas LL. 2011. Biochar for the mitigation of nitrate leaching from soil amended with biosolids. Sci. Total Envir. 409: 3206-3210.

Kreuzer M, Soliva CR. 2008. Nutrition: key to methane mitigation in ruminants. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 17: 168-171.

KOBAYASHI Y, SUZUKI Y, KOIKE S, MOCHIZUKI M, AND NAGASHIMA K. 2010. Cashew nut shell liquid, a novel candidate feed additive for ruminants: potency as a methane-reducing and propionate-enhancing agent. Greenhouse gases and animal agriculture conference. Banff. Canada

LENG RA, INTHAPANYA S, PRESTON TR. 2012. Methane production is reduced in an in vitro incubation when the rumen fluid is taken from cattle that previously received biochar in their diet. Livestock Research For Rural Development. Volume 11. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/soph23071.htm

LENG RA, PRESTON TR, INTHAPANYA S. 2012. Biochar reduces enteric methane and improves growth and feed conversion in local “Yellow†cattle fed cassava root chips and fresh cassava foliage. Livestock Research for

Rural Development. 11 (24). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/soph23071.htm

MARTIN C, MARGOVI DP, DOREAU M. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. J. Anim. 4:351-365.

MARTIN C, ROUEL, JOUANY JP, DOREAU M, AND CHILLIARD. 2008. Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairycows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. J. Anim. Sci. 86:2642–2650.

MAKKAR HPS. 2003. Quantification of tannin in tree an shrub foliage. A laboratory manual. Kluwer academic publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 102 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0273-7.

MAIA MRG, CHAUDHARY LC, FIGUERES L & WALLACE RI. 2007. Metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acid and their toxicity to the mcroflora of the rumen. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 91:303-314

MORGAVI DP. 2008. Manipulacion del ecisitema ruminal: que perspectivas. Reunion Cientifica Annual de la Asociacion Peruana de Produccion Animal. INRATheix, Dijon.

MORGAVI DP, FORANO E, MARTIN C, NEWBOLD CJ. 2010. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Anim. Consort. 4: 1024-1036.

MULJOHARDJO M. 1991. Jambu mente dan teknologi pengolahannya (Anacardium occidentale L). Liberty, Yogyakarta.

MITSUMORI M, ENISHI O, SHINKAI T, K, KOBAYASHI Y, TAKENAKA A, NAGASHIMA K, MOCHIZUKI M, KOBAYASHI Y. 2014. Effect of cashew nut shell liquid on metabolic hydrogen flow on bovine rumen fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 85:227-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/asJ12133.

NAIM M, ALEXANDRA CM, OLVEIRA BH, HIMELBLOOM MBL DAN CRAPO CA. 2012. Chemical characterization of commercial liquid smoke products. J. Food. Sci. Nutrition.1:102-115.

NJUKU FW, MWANGI PM, THIOING’O GT. 2014. Evaluation of cardanol acetate as a reactive dileuent for alkyd coatings. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2(3):928-941.

[NRC] NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. 2005. Nutrient requirements of dairy cows. Ed rev ke-6. National Academy Press. Washington DC. USA

PATRA AK, YU ZT. 2012. Effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation and abundance and diversity, rumen microbial population. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 4271-4280.

SAENAB A, WIRYAWAN KG, RETNANI Y, WINA E. 2016. Karakteristik fisik dan kimia dari produk bioindustri cangkang biji mete (Anacardium occidentale L). J. Littri. 22(2):81-90. https://doi.org/10.21082/littri.v22n2.2016.81-90

SAENAB A, WIRYAWAN KG, RETNANI Y, WINA E. 2017. Anacardic acid isolated from cashew nut shell (Anacardium occidentale L) affects methane and other products in the rumen fermentation. Med Pet. 40(2):100-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2017.40.2.100

SIMPEN IN. 2008. Isolasi cashew nut shell liquid dari cangkang biji jambu mete (Anacardium occidentale L) dan kajian beberapa sifat fisiko-kimianya. J. Kimia 2(2):71-76

SUDRAJAT R, SALIM S. 1994. Petunjuk teknis pembuatan arang aktif. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan. Bogor.

SUTARDI, T. 1994. Peningkatan Produksi Ternak Ruminansia melalui Amoniasi Pakan Serat Bermutu Rendah, Defaunasi dan Suplementasi Sumber Protein Tahan Degradasi dalam Rumen. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing 1993/1994. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

SHINKAI T, ENISHI O, MITSUMORI M, HIGUCHI K, KOBAYASHI Y, TAKENAKA A, NAGASHIMA K, MOCHIZUKI M, KOBAYASHI Y. 2012. Mitigation of methane production from cattle by feeding cashew nut shell liquid. J. Dairy. Sci. 95:5308-5316. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5554

STEEL RGD, TORRIE JH. 2005. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika: Suatu Pendekatan Biometrik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

THEODOROU MK, WILLIAMS BA, DHANOA MS, MC ALLAN AB, FRANCE J.1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 48:185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401 (94)90171-6

US EPA. 2006. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture. EPA 430-R-05-006. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC. USA

VAN SOEST PJ, ROBERTSON JB, LEWIS BA. 2001. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy. Sci. 74:3583-3597.

YAMAGUSHI K, RUTTANAVUT J AND S. TAKENOYAMA. 2010. Effects of dietary bamboo charcoal powder including vinegar liquid on chicken performance and histological alterrations of intestine. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 19:257-268.

WATANABE Y, SUZUKI R, KOIKE S, NAGASHIMA K, MOCHIZUKI M, FORSTER RJ, KOBAYASHI Y. 2010. In vitro evaluation of cashew nut shell liquid as a methane-inhibiting and propionate-enhancing agent for ruminants. J Dairy Sci. 93:5258–5267. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2754

WINA E. 2012. The use of plant bioactive compounds to mitigate enteric methane in ruminants and its application in Indonesia. Wartazoa. 22(1):24-34.

WANG HF, WANG JL, WANG C, ZHANG WM, LIU JX, DAI B. 2012. Effect of bamboo vinegar as an antibiotic alternative on growth performance and fecal bacterial communities of weaned piglets. Livestock Science. 144: 173–180

WOLIN MJ, MILLER TL. 1997 Microbe-microbe interactions. In Hobson PN, Steward CS (eds) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. 2ndedition Chapman Hall. UK. 470-490.

ZHANG W, XIAO S, SAMARAWEERA H, LEE E, AHN JDU. 2010. Improving functional value of meat products. J. Meat. Sci. 86:15-31.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Bookmark and Share