Sustainability Assessment of Kub Native Chicken Breeding Stock Availability in Malang Raya Using RAP-MDS

Pia Alpiah Rosa Melinda; Dewi Masyithoh; Umi Kalsum; Kenny Halfi; setiasih Setiasih; Eni Siti Rohaeni; Mewa Ariani; Yenny Nur Anggraeny

doi:10.14334/jitv.v30i4.3578

Sustainability Assessment of Kub Native Chicken Breeding Stock Availability in Malang Raya Using RAP-MDS

Pia Alpiah Rosa Melinda, Dewi Masyithoh, Umi Kalsum, Kenny Halfi, setiasih Setiasih, Eni Siti Rohaeni, Mewa Ariani, Yenny Nur Anggraeny

DOI

https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v30i4.3578

Abstract

One of the leading commodities in the poultry subsector is native chickens, especially the Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB) native chicken, which is developed by the Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development. The purpose of this study was to analyze the status and condition of the sustainability aspects related to the breeding stock availability of KUB native chickens in Malang Raya, examining it from six dimensions and 29 attributes. The analysis uses the RAP-Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) method to evaluate the sustainability indicators of breeding stock availability. Based on the study results, the dimensions that indicate an almost sustainable status are economic (70.77%), animal welfare (56.31%), ecology (55.42%), and institutional (50.24%). The dimensions social (49.92) and technology (49.05) are in the less sustainable category. The overall sustainability index value of the dimensions is in the almost sustainable category (56.00), indicating that the availability of KUB chicken seeds in Malang Raya will continue to be stable and has potential for further development. The attributes that need to be strengthened are community support, increasing access to training, biosecurity, vaccination program, and adopting technologies such as probiotics and productivity recording systems.

Keywords

Breeding Stock, Native Chikens, Sustainability, Multi-Dimensional-Scaling

References

Abbasi, I. A., Shamim, A., Shad, M. K., Ashari, H., & Yusuf, I. ., Abbasi, I. A., Shamim, A., Shad, M. K., Ashari, H., & Yusuf I. 2024. Circular economy-based integrated farming system for indigenous chicken: Fostering food security and sustainability. J Clean Prod. 436(140368.).

Alhassan H, Apuri MA, Cobbinah E, Abujaja AM. 2024. A Poultry Farmers’ Perception and Coping Strategies to Climate Change: Implications on Poultry Production n Bono East Region, Ghana. Ghana J Sci Technol Dev. 9(2):43–60. https://doi.org/10.47881/419.967x

Allaily A, Santoso AD, Rofiq MN, Sasongko NA, Daulay H, Wiloso EI, Widjaja E, Utomo BN, Yanuar AI, Suryani S, et al. 2024. Sustainability assessment of animal feed production from by-products of Sago palm smallholder industry. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 10(3):1275–1296. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2024.03.20

Antikasari RR, R. Iskandar, and Hardiani S. 2023. Sustainability analysis on Balitbangtan’s superior free-range chicken business (KUB) in Cianjur Regency. Sci J Innov. 23(2).

Apriliyanti, E., Suswandi, Arbianti AP. 2024. The Role of Institutions in the Development of Cabbage Agribusiness among the Argoayuningtani Farmer Group in Boyolali Regency. Agrineca Sci J. 24(2):35–46.

Asnawi A, Ridwan M, Nurlaelah S, Amrawaty AA, Baba S, Kasim K. 2023. Profile of the poultry system and the socio-economic impact of native chickens as a potential development area in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Anim Prod Sci. 63(17):1791–1803. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22406

Attia YA, Aldhalmi AK, Youssef IM, Bovera F, Tufarelli V, El-Hack MEA, El-Kholy KH, Shukry M. 2024. Climate change and its effects on poultry industry and sustainability. Discov Sustain [Internet]. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00627-2

Bakrie B, Rohaeni ES, Yusriani Y, Tirajoh S. 2021. The Development of a Newly Formed Superior Local Chicken in Indonesia-A Review. J Hunan Univ (Natural Sci. 48(9):25–34.

BPS. 202AD. Population statistics of Malang Regency 2019-2023. Malang: BPS Malang Regency.

Depison, Gushairiyanto, Irmaya D. 2022. Characterization Phenotype and Genetic Distance Some of the Native Chicken Strains in Jambi Province Indonesia. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 53(5):115–1166. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i5.1629

FAO. 2010. Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources. [place unknown]: Food and Agriculture Organization.

Kalangi LS, Lombogia SOB, Lenzun GD. 2025. Feasibility analysis of the KUB (Kampung Unggul Balitnak) chicken farming business in North Minahasa Regency (Case Study). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 1502(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1502/1/012043

Khattak F, Galgano S, Pearson R, Houdijk JGM, Short F, Leigh A. 2025. Enhancing key broiler welfare indicators, meat quality, and gut microbiome composition using oxygen-enriched drinking water under commercially relevant housing conditions. Poult Sci. 104(10):105550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105550

Kifaf, AE, Narni, F., and Triana G. 2023. Sustainability of milkfish farming business through a multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) approach. J Sociata. 1(1).

Lokman Ali M, Ab Rahman M, Shahidah Afifi Md Taujuddin N. 2020. Smart Chicken Farm Monitoring System. Evol Electr Electron Eng.. 1(1):317–325. http://publisher.uthm.edu.my/proceeding/index.php/eeee

Osuji EE, Onyeneke RU, Nkwocha GA, Olaolu MO. 2024. Exploring Impact of Climate Change on Poultry Production in Nigeria. Agric Res . 13(3):613–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-024-00708-8

Pasteur K, Diana A, Yatcilla JK, Barnard S, Croney CC. 2024. Access to veterinary care: evaluating working definitions, barriers, and implications for animal welfare. Front Vet Sci. 11(January):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1335410

Pitcher TJ, Preikshot D. 2001. rapfish: a rapid appraisal technique to evaluate the sustainability status of fisheries. Fish Res [Internet]. 49(3):255–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00205-8

Prawiranegara D, Mulijanti SL. 2024. Karakterisasi Faktor Penentu Keberlanjutan Pengembangan Ayam Kub Di Kabupaten Garut. Cr J (Creative Res West Java Dev. 6(01):1–14. https://doi.org/10.34147/crj.v6i01.250

Putra, DC, and Humaidah N. 2022. Effectiveness of Probiotics as a Replacement for Antibiotic Growth Promoters (AGP) in Poultry. J Anim Husb Eng Dyn. 5(2):239-249.

Rusdiana S and S. 2019. Efficiency of Balitbangtan’s superior local chicken breeding business on a small-scale livestock farm. Sci J Anim Husb Sci. 22(2):73–83.

Setiasih, Abdurrahman AM, Hermanto C, Saeri M. 2021. Type and Feasibility of Agribusiness of Kub Chicken Household Scale. E3S Web Conf. 316:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131601003

Silvera AM, Knowles TG, Butterworth A, Berckmans D, Vranken E, Blokhuis HJ. 2017. Lameness assessment with automatic monitoring of activity in commercial broiler flocks. Poult Sci [Internet]. 96(7):2013–2017. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex023

Sirajuddin. 2007. Factors that Motivate Livestock Breeders to Form Partnerships in Bantimurung District, Maros Regency. Agribus J. 6(2).

Subedi S, Bist R, Yang X, Chai L. 2023. Tracking pecking behaviors and damages of cage-free laying hens with machine vision technologies. Comput Electron Agric. 204:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107545

Sumantri C, Khaerunnisa I, Gunawan A. 2020. The genetic quality improvement of native and local chickens to increase production and meat quality in order to build the Indonesian chicken industry. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 492(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012099

Sutanto IA. 2021. Tingkah Laku Ayam Kub Pada Pemeliharaan Sistem Closed House (Behaviour of Kub Chicken Raisied in Closed House System). Trop Anim Sci. 3(2):9–15.

Wantasen E, Umboh SJK, Leke JR. 2024. Profit analysis of native chicken farming business in Kakas District, Regency of Minahasa, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 1341(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1341/1/012110

Younas S, Bukhari DA, Bibi Z, Ullah A, Rehman A. 2025. Impact of probiotic supplementation on growth performance, hematological parameters, and antibody titer responses to Newcastle disease in vaccinated broiler chickens. Appl Food Res . 5(2):101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101054