Meat Quality Characteristics of IPB-D1 Chicken and the Final Stock from Different Locations

Kresna Bhayu Adelta, Irma Isnafia Arief, Cece Sumantri, Zakiah Wulandari

Abstract

The increasing demand for animal protein encourages innovations development of new livestock types or breeds.  IPB-D1 chicken is an improved local chicken for their productivity.  Its rearing was carried out in Sukabumi and Bekasi Regency.  Physical, chemical, and microbiological quality testing of IPB-D1 chicken meat was carried out at the Integrated IPTP Laboratory and the Microbiology Laboratory of Livestock Products, and organoleptic testing was carried out in the Organoleptic Room, both of the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, IPB University.  The research was carried out from February to June 2022.  The scope of this research includes chicken rearing at two locations and sampling that aims to test the physical, chemical, microbiological, and organoleptic quality.  The chickens tested were the IPB-D1 Sukabumi chicken, IPB-D1 Bekasi chicken, IPB-D1 final stock Sukabumi chicken, IPB-D1 Bekasi final stock chicken, and Kampong, Sentul, and broiler chickens, which consist of 15 chickens each.  At each location, sampling was carried out 10 times as a replication.  The sampling technique used is simple random sampling.  The results showed that the quality of IPB-D1 chicken meat and its Final Stock did not have a significant difference (P>0.05) in physical quality aspects such as pH and water holding capacity (WHC) but had a significant difference (P<0.05) in cooking loss and tenderness than Kampong, Sentul, and broilers.  Meanwhile, the chemical quality of IPB-D1 broilers and their final stock showed significantly different results (P<0.05) in the fat content of the meat.  As for the parameters of ash content, protein, minerals, and cholesterol showed no significant difference (P>0.05).  Microbiological quality analysis in the form of total bacterial colonies (total plate count) of IPB-D1 broilers and its Final Stock was 105 CFU/g.  These results are still within the Maximum Microbial Contamination Limits set by the Indonesian National Standardization Agency in 2009.  Based on the results of this study, it is necessary to improve handling methods, hygienic packaging, and sanitation so that the quality of broilers can be improved and microbial contamination can be minimized.

Keywords

Characteristics; Chicken Meat; Final Stock; IPB-D1; Microbiology; Organoleptic

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afrianti M, Dwiloka B, Setiani BE. 2013. Total bakteri, pH, dan kadar air daging ayam broiler setelah direndam dengan ekstrak daun senduduk (Melastoma malabathricum L.) selama masa simpan. J Pangan Gizi. 4:49-56. DOI: 10.26714/jpg.4.1.2013.%25p.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2022. Distribusi Perdagangan Komoditas Daging Ayam Ras di Indonesia 2022. Jakarta (Indones): Badan Statistik Indonesia.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2009. SNI 2897:2009. Metode pengujian cemaran mikroba dalam daging, telur dan susu, serta hasil olahannya. Jakarta (Indones): Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Benamirouche K, Baazize-Ammi D, Hezil N, Djezzar4 R, Niar A, Guetarni D. 2020. Effect of probiotics and Yucca schidigera extract supplementation on broiler meat quality. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 42:e48066. DOI:10.4025 /actascianimsci.v42i1.48006

Chepkemoi M, Macharia JW, Sila D, Oyier P, Malaki P, Ndiema E, Agwanda B, Obanda V, Ngeiywa KJ, Lichoti J, Ommeh SC. 2017. Physical characteristics and nutritional composition of meat and eggs of five poultry species in Kenya. Livest Res Rural Develop. 29:15-19.

Fahruzaky S, Dwiloka B, Pramono YB, Mulyani S. 2020. Pengaruh berbagai metode thawing terhadap kadar protein dan kadar mineral bakso dari daging ayam petelur afkir beku. JTP. 4:82–87. DOI:10.14710/jtp.2020.26559.

Ganie TA, Rather SA, Wani HM, Gani A, Masoodi FA, Wani IA. 2015. Physico-chemical and functional properties of chicken meat protein isolate. Adv Biomed Pharma. 2:50-55.

Hafid H, Mujianto D, Agustina, Inderawati, Nuraini. 2017. The effect of storage time in the refrigerator on the quality of organoleptic beef. ADRI Int J Biol Educ. 1:29-36.

Hajrawati, Fadliah M, Wahyuni, Arief II. 2016. Kualitas fisik, mikrobiologis, dan organoleptik daging ayam broiler pada pasar tradisional di Bogor. JIPTHP. 4: 386-389. DOI:10.29244/jipthp.4.3.386-389.

Hartono, Iriyani N, Santosa. 2013. Penggunaan pakan fungsional terhadap daya ikat air, susut masak dan keempukan daging ayam broiler. J Ilmiah Peternak. 1:10-19.

Herlina, Aji SA, Purnomo BH. 2020. Physical, Chemical, and Sensory Characteristics of Chicken Sausage with Analog Meat Substitution. Indust J Teknol Manajem Agroindust. 10:67-77. DOI:10.21776/ub.industria.2021.010.01.8.

Kakhki RAM, Bakhshalinejad R, Shafiee M. 2016. Effect of dietary zinc and αtocopheryl acetate on broiler performance, immune responses, antioxidant enzyme activities, minerals, and vitamin concentration in blood and tissues of broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 221:12-36. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.016

Khaerunnisa I, Arief II, Pramujo M, Budiman C, Gunawan A, Jakaria, Sumantri C. 2016. Polymorphism of the T4842G Myostatin gene is associated with carcass characteristics in Indonesian chickens. Int J Poult Sci. 15:316–324. DOI:10.3923/ijps.2016.316.324

Liu SK, Niu ZY, Min YN, Wang ZP, Zang J, He ZF, Li HL, Sun TT, Liu FZ. 2015. Effects of dietary crude protein on the growth performance, carcass, characteristics, and serum biochemical indexes of Luoyang black-bones chickens from seven to twelve weeks of age. Brazilian J Poult Sci. 17:103-108. DOI:10.1590/1516-635x170 1103-108.

Liur IJ. 2020. Kualitas kimia dan mikrobiologis daging ayam broiler pada pasar tradisional kota ambon. J Biol Appl Biol. 3:59-66. DOI:10.21580/ah.v3i2.6166.

Mahmud ATBA, Afnan R, Damiana RE, Arief II. 2017. Profil darah, performans dan kualitas daging ayam persilangan kampung broiler pada kepadatan kandang berbeda. J Vet. 18:247-256. DOI:10.19087/jveteriner.2017.18.2.247.

Matjik AA, Sumertajaya MI. 2013. Perancangan percobaan dengan aplikasi SAS dan Minitab. 4th printed. Bogor (Indones): IPB Press.

Mir NA, Rafiq A, Shukla V. 2017. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 54:2997-3009. DOI:10.1007 /s13197-017-2789-z.

Prasetyo, Padaga HMC , Sawitri ME. 2013. Kajian Kualitas Fisiko Kimia Daging Sapi Di Pasar Kota Malang. J Ilmu Teknol Hasil Ternak. 8:1-8. DOI:10.21776/ub.jitek. 2013.008.02.1

Qurniawan A, Arief II, Afnan R. 2016. Performans produksi ayam pedaging pada lingkungan pemeliharaan pada ketinggian yang berbeda di sulawesi selatan. J Vet. 17:622-63. DOI:10.19087/jveteriner.2016.17.4.622.

Rotiah, Widiastuti, Sunarti D. 2019. Relative weight of small intestine and lymphoid organ of finisher period Broiler chicken at different rearing temperatures. J Anim Res Appl Sci. 1:6-10. DOI: 10.22219/aras.v1i1.8299.

Sahriawati, Sumarlin, Wahyuni S. 2019. Validasi metode dan penetapan kadar kolesterol ayam broiler dengan metode lieberman-burchard. Lutjanus. 24.

Semjon B, Marcincakova D, Korenekova B, Bartkovsky M, Nagy J, Turek P, Marcincak S. 2020. Multiple factorial analysis of physicochemical and organoleptic properties of breast and thigh meat of broilers fed a diet supplemented with humic substances. Poult Sci. 99:1750–1760. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.012.

Soeparno. 2016. Ilmu dan teknologi daging. 2nd edition. Yogyakarta (Indones): Gajahmada University Press.

Sumantri C, Darwati S. 2017. Perkembangan terkini riset ayam unggul IPB-D1. In: Proceedings of the National Seminar on Livestock Industry I. Bogor (Indones): Faculty of Animal Science IPB University. p. 3-7.

Susanti F, Murtini S, Wibawan IWT. 2020. Respons kekebalan ayam ipb d1 yang memiliki gen TLR4 terhadap infeksi bakteri Salmonella enteritidis. J Vet. 21:208-215. DOI:10.19087/jveteriner.2020.21.2.208.

Swain PS, Rao SBN, Rajendran D, Dominic G, Selvaraju S. 2016. Nano zinc an alternative to conventional zinc as animal feed supplement; a review. Anim Nut. 30:1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.aninu.2016.06.003.

Tamzil, M. H. 2014. Stres panas pada unggas: metabolisme, akibat dan upaya penanggulangannya. Wartazoa. 24:58-66.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.