Household Consumers Perception towards Frozen Beef

Astari Apriantini, Irma Isnafia Arief, Lucia cyrilla ENSD
 DOI  https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v27i4.3003

Abstract

Demand of beef in Indonesia is higher compared to the domestic beef supply, hence the Indonesian government has established policy to import frozen beef from other countries in order to support the high demand of Indonesia people. However, mosf of Indonesian people prefer to purchase fresh meat (freshly slaughtered beef) rather than frozen beef. The aims of this study were to identify the characteristics of household consumers who bought beef meat and their perceptions towards frozen beef; including to analyze the relationship between perceptions and consumer characteristics of frozen beef, and to analyze the consumer behavior in making decision to buy frozen beef in Bogor area and DKI Jakarta. Total about 200 households were directly interviewed using structured questionnaire. The questionnaires includes general characteristics of respondents (age, education level, occupation, income, number of family member), purchasing behavior which was analyzed descriptively, and respondents perceptions toward frozen beef which was analyzed by calculating the average value of perception and then categorized based on the level of perception category. Results showed that consumer’s perceptions toward frozen beef according to several aspects had a low score (average final score 2.37), indicated that consumers had a poor perceptions towards frozen beef. Furthermore, most of the respondents who buy beef were housewives who buy meat in traditional markets which only provide fresh meat, they assumed that fresh meat had very good quality because the meat came from slaughtered beef.  Those respondents think that freezing causes negative effects on beef, freezing treatment reduce the quality such as changes of meat color and flavour; and reduce nutritional content of beef.  It was discovered that socialization about frozen beef and the process of handling frozen meat is required for household consumers to control the quality of beef as well as to increase the consumer’s trusts in purchasing frozen beef.

Keywords

Consumer Perception; Frozen Beef; Household consumer; Purchase Behavior

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adiana PPE, Karmini NL. 2012. Pengaruh pendapatan, jumlah anggota keluarga, dan pendidikan terhadap pola konsumsi rumah tangga miskin di Kecamatan Gianyar. E-J Ekon Pembang. 1:1–60.

Agustina R. 2018. Analisis penyebab konsumen lebih memilih berbelanja di pasar tradisional dibandingkan pasar modern (Studi kasus masyarakat 15a Kota Metro) [Skripsi]. Metri (Indones): Institut Agama Islam Negeri.

Agyekum CK, Haifeng H, Agyeiwaa A. 2015. Consumer perception of product quality. Microeconomics Macroecon. 3:25–29.

Aidani E, Aghamohammadi B, Akbarian M, Morshedi A, Hadidi M, Ghasemkhani N, Akbarian A. 2014. Effect of Chilling, freezing and thawing on meat quality: A Review. Int J Biosci. 5:159–169.

Akbari AD, Sulaeman A, Palupi E. 2016. Persepsi konsumen terhadap aspek gizi dan kesehatan pangan organik: [Skripsi]. Bogor (Indones): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Angriva S, Sunyigono AK. 2020. Persepsi dan preferensi konsumen terhadap produk madu PT. Kembang Joyo. Agriscience. 1:186–199.

Apriantini A, Arief II, Ensd LC, Riyanto S, Adiyoga R. 2021. Persepsi dan perilaku konsumen bisnis terhadap daging sapi beku, studi kasus: DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. J Ilmu Prod Teknol Has Peternak. 9:20–29.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2013. Survei sosial ekonomi nasional (Susenas) 2013. Jakarta (Indones): Badan Pusat Statistik.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2015. Survei sosial ekonomi nasional (Susenas) 2013. Bogor (Indones): Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Konsumsi bahan pokok 2019. Jakarta (Indones): Badan Pusat Statistik.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Survei ekonomi nasional 2021. Jakarta (Indones): Badan Pusat Statistik.

Boler DD, Woerner DR. 2017. What is meat? A perspective from the American Meat Science Association. Anim Front. 7:8–11. DOI:10.2527/af.2017.0436.

Coombs CEO, Holman BWB, Friend MA, Hopkins DL. 2017. Long-term red meat preservation using chilled and frozen storage combinations: A Review. Meat Sci. 125:84–94. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.11.025.

Dermawan R. 2016. Pengambilan keputusan landasan filosofis, konsep dan aplikasi. Bandung (Indones): Alfabeta.

Dewati R, Saputro WA. 2020. Persepsi konsumen terhadap pembelian produk herbal di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. J Ilmu-Ilmu Pertan. 4:144–152.

Dewi SHC. 2012. Persepsi konsumen terhadap pembelian produk herbal di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. J Agrisains. 3:1–12.

Ernawati F, Imanningsih N, Nurjanah N, Sahara E, Sundari D, Arifin AY, Prihatini M. 2018. Nilai pH dan kualitas Zat gizi makro daging beku, dingin dan segar pada pasar tradisional dan pasar swalayan. Penelit Gizi Makanan. 41:21–30.

Gunawan L. 2013. Analisa perbandingan kualitas fisik daging sapi impor dan daging sapi lokal. J Hosp dan Manaj Jasa. 1:1–21.

Haq AN, Septinova D, Santosa PE. 2015. Kualitas fisik daging dari pasar tradisional di Bandar Lampung. J Ilm Peternak Terpadu. 3:98–103.

Hasanah S, Lubis SN, Khadijah S. 2018. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi konsumsi daging sapi di Kota Medan. J Soc Econ Agric Agribus. 9):1–12.

Ibrahim F, Adinugraha HH. 2020. Atribut produk yang dipertimbangkan dalam pembelian kosmetik dan pengaruhnya pada kepuasan konsumen di Surabaya. Li Falah-Jurnal Stud Ekon Bisnis Islam. 5:150–170.

Istiqlal AH. 2013. Atribut produk dalam keputusan pembelian konsumen. J Ekon Manaj. 1(1):20–30.

Jafrinur, Wati R, Ermanda AP. 2018. Faktor penentu permintaan daging sapi rumah tangga di wilayah perkotaan provinsi Jawa Barat. Semnas Persepsi III Manad. 26:336–351.

Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal D. 2015. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 7:396–403. DOI:10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.

Kotler P, Amstrong G. 2012. Principles of marketing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Nadaraja R, Yazdanifard R. 2013. Social media marketing: advantages and disadvantages. Soc Media Mark.:1–10.

Nafiasari NA, Handayani AM. 2019. Penganalisis kesegaran daging sapi dan daging babi mentah berdasarkan klasifikasi warna dan kelembaban. J Teknosains. 8:1–88. DOI:10.22146/teknosains.35643.

Ockerman HW, Basu L. 2014. Carcass Chilling and boning. In: Encycl Meat Sci. Elsevier. p.142–147. DOI:10.1016 /B978-0-12-384731-7.00162-8.

OECD. 2021. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2021-2030.: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. DOI:10.1787/19428846-en.

Permana MV. 2013. Peningkatan kepuasan pelanggan melalui kualitas produk dan kualitas layanan. J Din Manaj. 4:115–131.

Pham QT. 2014. Refrigeration and freezing technology : thawing. In: Encycl Meat Sci. Elsevier. p. 202–208. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-384731-7.00124-0.

Prasetyo H, Padaga MC, Sawitri ME. 2013. Kajian kualitas fisiko kimia daging sapi di pasar Kota Malang. J Ilmu dan Teknol Has Ternak. 8:1–8.

Puradireja R, Herlina L, Arief H. 2021. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi permintaan daging sapi di Provinsi Lampung. J Pemikir Masy Ilm Berwawasan Agribisnis. 7:1439–1448.

Rahman MS. 2020. Handbook of food preservation. 3rd ed. New York (USA): CRC Press.

Rajan AP, Sammansu JM, Suresh S. 2021. Consumer Buying behaviour. IJSART. 7:397-400.

Riyanto S, Hatmawan AA. 2020. Metode riset penelitian kuantitatif penelitian di bidang manajemen, teknik, pendidikan dan eksperimen. Yogyakarta (Indones): Deepublish.

Rondonuwu M. 2013. Tingkat Pendidikan, motivasi dan promosi pengaruhnya terhadap keputusan penggunaan produk nasabah priority banking Bank Sulut. J EMBA. 1:257–264.

Saraswati T, Karang K. 2016. Kualitas daging sapi wagyu dan daging sapi bali yang disimpan pada Suhu -19oC. Indones Med Veterinus. 4:178–185.

Sumarwan U. 2015. Perilaku konsumen : teori dan penerapannya dalam pemasaran. Bogor (Indones): Ghalia Indonesia.

Tzimitra-Kalogiani I. 1996. Consumers’ Attitudes to Frozen Meat. Medit. 7:34–37.

Venkatachalam K, Surumbarkuzhali M. 2018. A study on consumers' perception towards Hyundai cars with special reference to Tiruppur City. IRJMST. 9:21-28.

Yusup F. 2018. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. J Tarb J Ilm Kependidikan. 7:17–23.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Bookmark and Share