Hide
Show all
Email this article 
Effectiveness of DMSO concentration on recovery rate and viability of primordial germ cell of Gaok chicken
Abstract
Recent technological developments to produce germ line chimeras with primordial germ cell (PGC) transfer into the recipient embryo provide an opportunity to conserve and retrieval of chicken genetic resources in complete form. The study was conducted to obtain the most effective DMSO percentage to recovery rate and viability of Gaok chicken PGC after freezing which will later be feasible to be transferred. In this study, the eggs of Gaok chicken were incubated for about 2.5 - 3 days to obtain embryos at stages 14 - 16. Blood retrieval was done through the dorsal aorta using micropipettes under microscope. The procedure of PGC isolation of Gaok chicken with centrifugation gradient was using nycodenz as a substance. Commercially available cryoprotectants (dimethyl sulfoxide = DMSO) were used for PGC freezing. Isolated and frozen PGCs of Gaok chicken were diluted with cryoprotectants containing 2.5; 5 and 10% DMSO in fetal bovine serum (FBS). The recovery rate of 2.5; 5 and 10% DMSO concentration were 36.4; 48.2 and 48 % respectively. The viability of PGC after freezing was significantly higher for 5% DMSO compared with 2.5% DMSO (P<0.05), but not different from 10% DMSO. It can be concluded that the concentration DMSO of 5 % was effectve contration in freezing Gaok chicken PGC.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Benesova B, Trefil P. 2016. Possibilities for preserving genetic resources in birds. World's Poult Sci J. 72:629-642.
Best B. 1990. Viability, cryoprotectant toxicity and chilling injury in cryogenics. [accessed May 1st 2013]. http://www.benbest.com/pdf.
Blesbois E, Seigneurin F, Grasseau I, Limouzin C, Besnard J, Gourichon D, Coquerelle G, Rault P, Tixier-Boichard M. 2007. Semen cryopreservation for ex situ management of genetic diversity in chicken: creation of the French avian cryobank. Poult Sci. 86:555-64.
Freshney RI. 2005. Culture of animal cells: A manual of basic technique. 5th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Liss Inc.
Gautam SK, Verma V, Palta P, Chauhan MS, Manik RS. 2008. Effect of type of cryoprotectant on morphology and developmental competence of in vitro-matured buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes subjected to slow freezing or vitrification. Reprod Fertil Dev. 20:490-496.
Hafez ESE. 2000. Preservation and cryopreservation of gamet and embrio. In: Hafez B and ESE Hafez, editors. Reproduction in farm animal. 7th ed. USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
[IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2015. Status category summary by major taxonomic group (animals). [accessed October 24th 2017]. http://www.iucnredlist.org/ about/summary-statistics#Tables_3_4.
Kohara Y, Kanai Y, Tajima A. 2008. Cryopreservation of gonadal germ cells (GGCs) from the domestic chicken using vitrification. J Poult Sci. 45:57-61.
Kostaman T, Sopiyana S, Setioko AR. 2011. Rate of temperature reduction at cryopreservation primordial germ cells (PGC) of three Indonesian native chicken. JITV. 16:218-223.
Kostaman T. 2013. Isolasi dan kriopreservasi primordial germ cells (PGCs) menggunakan krioprotektan DMSO untuk pembentukan germline chimera ayam Gaok (Disertasi). [Bogor (Indones)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Kostaman T. 2014. Purification method and storage of primordial germ cells-circulation for preservation of local chicken. Wartazoa. 24:161-170.
Lahnsteiner F. 2008. The effect of internal and external cryoprotectants on zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Theriogenology. 69:384-396.
Liu J, Song Y, Cheng KM, Silversides FG. 2010. Production of donor-derived offspring from cryopreserved ovarian tissue in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Biol Reprod. 83:15-23.
Mohamad K, Djuwita I, Boediono A, Supriatna I. 2005. Vitrifikasi ovarium mencit menggunakan etilen glikol dan DMSO sebagai krioprotektan dan viabilitasnya pasca autotransplantasi di subkapsula ginjal. Media Kedokteran Hewan. 21:23-27.
Mohr LR, Trounson AO. 1981. Structural changes associated with freezing of bovine embryos. Biol Reprod. 25:1009-1025.
Moore DT, Purdy PH, Blackburn HD. 2006. A Method for cryopreserving chicken primordial germ cells. Poult Sci. 85:1784-1790.
Nakamura Y, Usui F, Miyahara D, Mori T, Watanabe H, Ono T, Takeda K, Nirasawa K, Kagami H, Tagami T. 2011. Viability and functionality of primordial germ cells after freeze-thaw in chickens. J Poult Sci. 48:57-63.
Nandi S, Whyte J, Taylor L, Sherman A, Nair V, Kaiser P, McGrew MJ. 2016. Cryopreservation of specialized chicken lines using cultured primordial germ cells. Poult Sci 95:1905-1915.
Notman R, Noro M, O’Malley B, Anwar J. 2006. Molecular basis for dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) action on lipid membranes. J Ameri Chem Society. 128:13982-13983.
Pegg DE. 2002. The history and principles of cryopreservation. Seminar Reprod Med. 20:5-13.
Riesco MF, Martinez-Pastor F, Chereguini O, Robles V. 2012. Evaluation of zebrafish (Danio rerio) pgcs viability and dna damage using different cryopreservation protocols. Theriogenology. 77:122-130.
Rizal M, Toelihere MR, Yusuf TL, Purwantara B, Situmorang P. 2003. Kualitas semen beku domba garut dalam berbagai konsentrasi gliserol. JITV. 7:194-199.
Rosato MP, Iaffaldano N. 2013. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification. Theriogenology. 79:508-516.
Santiago-Moreno J, Castano C, Toledano-Diaz A, Coloma MA, Lopez-Sebastian A, Prieto MT, Campo JL. 2011. Semen cryopreservation for the creation of a Spanish poultry breeds cryobank: optimization of freezing rate and equilibration time. Poult Sci. 90:2047-53.
Santos RR, Rodrigues APR, Costa SHF, Silva JRV, Matos MHT, Lucci CM, Bao SN, Van den Hurk R, Figueiredo JR. 2006. Histological and ultrastructural analysis of cryopreserved sheep preantral follicles. Anim Reprod Sci. 91:249-263.
Sawicka D, Chojnacka-Puchta L, Zielinski M, Plucienniczak G, Plucienniczak A, Bednarczyk M. 2015. Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis in cryoconserved chicken primordial germ cells. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 20:143-159.
Setioko AR, Tagami T, Tase H, Nakamura Y, Takeda K, Nirasawa K. 2007. Cryopreservation of primordial germ cells (PGCs) from White Leghorn embryos using commercial cryoprotectants. J Poult Sci. 44:73-77.
Silversides FG, Robertson MC, Liu J. 2013. Cryoconservation of avian gonads in Canada. Poult Sci. 92:2613-7.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1995. Prinsip dan prosedur statistika: Suatu pendekatan biometrik. B. Sumantri, penerjemah. Jakarta (ID): Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Terjemahan dari: Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach.
Tonus C, Cloquette K, Ectors F, Piret J, Gillet L, Antoine N, Desmecht D, Vanderplasschen A, Waroux O, Grobet L. 2016. Long term-cultured and cryopreserved primordial germ cells from various chicken breeds retain high proliferative potential and gonadal colonisation competency. Reprod Fertil Dev. 28:628-39.
Tonus C, Connan D, Waroux O, Vandenhove B, Wayet J, Gillet L, Desmecht D, Antoine N, Ectors FJ, Grobet L. 2017. Cryopreservation of chicken primordial germ cells by vitrification and slow freezing: A comparative study. Theriogenology. 88:197-206.
Valerdi MR, Eftekhari P, Yazdi, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. 2009. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 26:347-354.
Watson PF. 2000. The caused of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 60-61:481-492.
Yan H, Wu B, Wang K, Sun A. 2016. DMSO and straws applied in cryopreservation of chicken blastodermal cells. Afr J Sci Res. 5:14-20.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
